Essay style Why has the European Union been particularly active in its

Style Why has the European Union been particularly active in its employment anti-discrimination measures Set out the ma - Essay ExampleThe diverse nature of conflicts within the European requires some form of moderation in order to achieve a level playing principle that can effectively lead towards the attainment of the shared goals (Salama & Council of Europe 2011, p. 121). The EU membership comprises of countries that speak distinguishable languages, which imply different cultures and worldviews. Some of the countries have had some historical challenges that could threaten the harmonious coexistence within the Union. Concerns oer the possible dominance of some countries over others and presumed imbalances in various aspects of life such as business, international influence, and resources have fue lead concerns of prejudice, preferential discourse, and discrimination within the union. It is because of this that the EU endeavors to enhance its operations in shipway that foster unity and balance among member countries. Discrimination is largely a factor of competitive gain (European Commission, 2008, p. 65). Discrimination is most likely to occur in conditions where many nationalities come together towards the attainment of certain objectives. Internal competitions and power struggles will tend to surface in ways that make it problematic for countries to utter their concerns more effectively. The constituent members within the Union seek the attainment of certain political goals, social goals, and economic goals. The reality of discrimination places a direct hurdle towards the attainment of these goals. Tendencies of cultural supremacy and fears of cultural lower status have, in the past, slowed down the integration of the EU members. Some countries have expressed reservations that the current operational mood is skewed in favor of particular countries (Corry, 1996). Internal differences between Anglophone members of the EU and other countries have le d to fears of discrimination, which are because some countries are likely to benefit from undue advantage over others. It is for this reason that the EU sought to draft specific legislations that provide sufficient safeguards against the possibility of lapsing into acts of discrimination based on language, culture, or country of origin (Fella & Ruzza, 2012, p. 40). These specific safeguards are meant to assure the member countries of fairness in the treatment of their citizens and countries in terms of certain benefits that relate to the specific issues that connect with the mutual interests that connect with the union. Discrimination usually imposes structural and systematic obstacles to the victims (Kahn, 2008). It curves out a system that provides privileges to some people or groups while subjecting others under unfair treatments. On this score, the EU sought to prevent the possibility of discrimination, as a way of advance the full participation and impartial treatment of its member countries and the citizens of the same countries as they moved about within the region covered geographically by the union (Falkner, Treib, & Holzleithner, 2008). Efforts to determine the real extent of EUs power should be understood from the fact that the union embodies certain qualities and virtues that must be upheld for the sake of its sustenance. The recognition of the projected ends of the union depends significantly on the manner in which the unions operate and the balance of power and traffic between them. The handling of matters of discriminati